[ad_1]
It’s been instructed that the monarch might have died as a toddler and been changed with a village boy over fears of Henry VIII’s response – a concept heightened by her by no means having married or had kids
Was she actually a male imposter?(Image: Getty Images)
A shocking theory suggests that Queen Elizabeth I may have actually been a man posing as a woman instead of the true monarch we know her to have been.
The late ruler, who was monarch from 1558 until she died in 1603, was so legendary that her reign was officially crowned the Elizabethan era and she was also a warrior who defeated the Spanish Armada.
But sceptics believe all is not as it seems as it has now been suggested the Virgin Queen may not have been what history claims her to be – instead suggesting a male “imposter” took over and created her legacy because the final longest reigning monarch of the House of Tudor.
The legend says that she died younger and her caretakers changed her with a boy as disguise the demise from Henry VIII(Image: Getty Images)
A wild theory claims the monarch, who died at 69 years of age, may have in fact passed much younger and been replaced by a male leader. According to History Extra, bones found in a mysterious grave in the 1900s continue to spark the theory.
The fierce leader famously proclaimed herself once the Spanish Armada had been defeated: “I do know I’ve the physique of a weak and feeble lady, however I’ve the guts and abdomen of a King.”
It’s additionally stated she confirmed extra masculine options in her varied portraits(Image: Getty Images)
Now known as the ‘Bisley Boy’ legend, the conspiracy theory suggests she died as a child and was secretly replaced by a boy of similar age to avoid the wrath of King Henry VIII, who was famously obsessed with having a male heir.
The concept was made standard in Bram Stoker’s ebook Famous Imposters which boldly claimed Elizabeth died in Bisley, Gloucestershire, and right here her caretakers allegedly changed her with a boy from the village who resembled her to keep away from the royal’s wrath.
It is a moderately wild concept(Image: Print Collector/Getty Images)
Theorists say Elizabeth having never married or having bore no children support the theory as she may have been hiding this secret.
It’s also said she showed more masculine features in her various portraits and refused medical examinations even post-death.
Historians nonetheless wildly dismiss the speculation saying it was fuelled by Victorian-era sensationalism and gendered concepts about energy.
Historians say there isn’t a credible proof(Image: UIG through Getty Images)
Professor Kate Williams, specialising in the Tudor period, strongly refuted the claims and said there was never any credible evidence supporting the theory.
Helen Castor, the historian behind She-Wolves: The Women Who Ruled England Before Elizabeth, highlighted that the monarch’s early life, family resemblance and lifelong struggles as a female monarch all proved she was a woman and said such accusations only emerged centuries after her death.
Many believe the idea that a boy, and later man, could have deceived the court, dignitaries and lifelong attendants was impossible.
For the most recent breaking information and tales from throughout the globe from the Daily Star, join our newsletters.
[ad_2]
